ÿþ<? require "../proj_header.php" ?><? print_head("teorarch-2","New Archaeology - v.2"); 

?>



<div id="content">

<h1>CONTENTS</h1>

<TABLE style="TEXT-ALIGN: left" cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 border=1>

<tr>

<td>Foreword</td><td>3</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>I. Swedish rationalism and revolution in archaeology</td><td>8</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>1.	Background of Swedish rationalism</td><td>8</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>2.	From 2M to 3H</td><td>12</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>3.	Mats Malmer as a transmissionist</td><td>13</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>4.	Cherchez la femme. Money, money, money& </td><td>18</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>5.	Laurels omitted</td><td>20</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>6.	Material: Normans before Normans</td><td>25</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>II. Malmer s work and struggle</td><td>35</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>1.	Principles of Spätneolithische Studien</td><td>35</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>2.	Discussion</td><td>36</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>3.	Methodological innovations: isarythms</td><td>41</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>4.	Methodological innovations: taking into account the level of investigation</td><td>46</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>5. Methodological innovations: quantitative aspect</td><td>51</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>III. The justification of typology</td><td>56</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>1.	Typology as a pivot of archaeology</td><td>56</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>2.	Typology and typological method</td><td>60</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>3.	Typology and classification</td><td>63</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>4.	Humanities and sciences</td><td>70</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>5.	Typology: a kew to the nature of archaeology</td><td>75</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>IV. Typological series and assemlage</td><td>78</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>1.	Drawbacks of the typological method</td><td>78</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>2.	Typological elements and gradation</td><td>79</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>3.	The proof of series  non-randomness</td><td>81</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>4.	Independent typological elements</td><td>84</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>5.	Malmer sucessor of Montelius</td><td>86</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>6.	More reliable than assemblages?</td><td>89</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>7.	More reliable than stratigraphy?</td><td>96</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>V.  Rationalism  vs.  impressionism </td><td>98</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>1.	Objectivity of studies</td><td>98</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>2.	Terminology of oppositions</td><td>99</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>3.	Between logic and intuition</td><td>103</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>4.	Definitions</td><td>106</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>5.	Exactness of measurements</td><td>108</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>6.	Formulations</td><td>111</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>7.	The priority of definitions</td><td>114</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>8.	Requirements to definitions</td><td>117</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>VI.  Rationalism  vs.  empiricism </td><td>119</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>1.	Another front</td><td>119</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>2.	Things and relations</td><td>120</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>3.	Our types are adequate - to what?</td><td>123</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>4.	Concessions to  empiricism </td><td>125</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>5.	Ford s model</td><td>128</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>6.	In defence of relative types</td><td>133</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>7.	Attitude toward Neopositivism</td><td>136</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>8.	Without theory?</td><td>138</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>9.	Apriority of cultures</td><td>140</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>10.	Cultures without clear borders</td><td>145</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>11.	Culture and ideology</td><td>147</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>VII. From type to period</td><td>149</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>1.	More on requirements to definitions</td><td>149</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>2.	On transitional forms</td><td>149</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>3.	Analytical classification vs. typology	of things</td><td>151</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>4.	Division in periods</td><td>155</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>5.	Production diagrams</td><td>157</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>VIII. Migration or local development?</td><td>170</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>1.	Biases and migrations</td><td>170</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>2.	Migration: arguments and counter-arguments</td><td>174</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>3.	Theory or biases?</td><td>179</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>4.	Criteria of migration reliability</td><td>181</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>5.	The concept of autochtonous development</td><td>184</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>IX. Invention and diffusion</td><td>190</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>1.	The problem of territorial coverage</td><td>190</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>2.	The mechanism of innovation</td><td>193</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>3.	Substantiation with facts</td><td>198</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>4.	The sense of production diagrams</td><td>202</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>5.	The problem of realistic comprehension</td><td>208</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>Conclusion</td><td>215</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>1.	Three M</td><td>215</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>2.	Useful errors</td><td>216</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>Literature</td><td>218</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>Summary (in Russian)</td><td>232</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>Summary (in English)</td><td>239</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>Name index</td><td>246</td>

</tr><tr>

<td>Subject index</td><td>249</td>

</tr>

</table>

</div>



<? require "../page_footer.php" ?>